Full Frame Vs Micro Four Thirds Low Light

To get the equivalent depth of field you similarly divide aperture by 2.

Full frame vs micro four thirds low light.

The relatively small four thirds sensor format experienced a big hype not only since olympus published it s best seller om d e m5 in early 2012. Full frame cameras are capable of capturing the most light and will almost always out perform an aps c or micro four thirds camera body under low light conditions. Full frame vs crop pixel size let s take a look at the full frame canon 5ds which is a 50 megapixel camera. In this article i want to talk about the controversial debate about full frame versus micro four thirds format.

Micro four thirds vs aps c low light and crop factor explained sony a6500 http amzn to 2kiewzp sony a6300 https goo gl unnozg panasonic g85 http. You only need to use both to understand why. The nikon d7000 is a 16 megapixel 1 5x crop aps c sensor with a pixel size of 4 7 microns. That means this crop body actually has bigger pixels than the full frame 5ds.

The latest sensor technology such as bsi cmos sensors give an advantage here as do cameras. That means it has a pixel size of 4 1 microns. You can read a lot about this across the internet. For low light photography you need a camera with a large sensor and bright lens f 1 2 f 1 4 f 1 8.

A 50mm lens on full frame is 25mm on micro four thirds. Micro four thirds sensors don t perform well under low light conditions where the iso needs to be cranked up to say above 2000. If you re not sure what a micro four thirds camera is it s a smaller mirrorless camera that first came about in 2008 and has a crop factor of 2x in relation to full frame sensors aps c format. I actually would predict olympus will possibly pull out of this format they ll deny it of course which will eventually disappear as full frame and medium format mirrorless cameras will be reduced in sizes close to mft.

I now know olympus and micro four thirds will just never cut it versus full frame.